Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Jackson wrote:

> Christoph wrote:
> > The library interface can set flags to modify behavior.
> 
> A library such as libnuma can set them, yes, but not everyone uses
> libnuma.  Basically everyone uses the standard C library, glibc, which
> has the system call wrappers, but these wrappers should not be setting
> optional flags.
> 
> We're going around in circles here, Christoph.

Yes and you keep missing the point focusing on stuff that is not relevant.
Where did you get the rule that libraries should not be setting flags? 
libraries do all sort of conversion before calling the kernel API.

Look the libraries are a strong argument against the method of setting 
task flags. If you are using multiple libraries some of which have been 
updated and some of those which have not then setting a task flag can 
have bad consequences. You want clean syscall behavior.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux