On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:06:24 +0200, Vitaliy Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you still want to go ahead with a 2.4 backport? > > Yep. Will do it asap. In latest 2.4 patch we had just a locks issue. > So do you think I should modify 2.4 patch with all modifications we done in 2.6 version included? Something like that, yes. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Vitaliy Ivanov <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Vitaliy Ivanov <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Vitaliy Ivanov <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Vitaliy Ivanov <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- From: Vitaliy Ivanov <[email protected]>
- USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Smackv9: Use a stateful parser for parsing Smack rules
- Previous by thread: Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- Next by thread: Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- Index(es):
 |