On Oct 25 2007 19:56, Greg KH wrote: >What kind of code is not accepted into the mainline kernel tree for good >reasons? What are these reasons? What specific code are you talking >about? > >I'm trying to compile a list of all known external modules and drivers >and work to get them included in the main kernel tree to help prevent >these kinds of things. If you know of any that are not on the list at: > http://linuxdriverproject.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/OutOfTreeDrivers >please feel free to add them, or email me with the needed information >and I will add them to the list. quad_dsp - http://jengelh.hopto.org/p/quad_dsp/ Provides a /dev/dsp style node for legacy applications that support neither ALSA nor the AOSS wrapper nor more-than-2-channel sound. thkd - ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-jengelh/kernel/linux-2.6.23.1-ccj58/thkd.diff Workaround for Toshiba MK2003GAH hard-drive head auto-unloading after 5-15 seconds. (Ref: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/15/100 ) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
- From: "Lee Revell" <[email protected]>
- Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
- References:
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
- From: "Simon Arlott" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface
- Prev by Date: Re: pci-disable-decode-of-io-memory-during-bar-sizing.patch
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH resend] Make the dev_*() family of macros in device.h complete
- Previous by thread: Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- Next by thread: Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
- Index(es):
 |