On 10/29/07, Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > quad_dsp - http://jengelh.hopto.org/p/quad_dsp/ > > Provides a /dev/dsp style node for legacy applications that support > neither ALSA nor the AOSS wrapper nor more-than-2-channel sound. > (I think that should read "AND more than 2 channel sound") Couldn't ALSA's OSS emulation be extended to support more than 2 channels per device node? > > thkd - ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-jengelh/kernel/linux-2.6.23.1-ccj58/thkd.diff > > Workaround for Toshiba MK2003GAH hard-drive head auto-unloading after > 5-15 seconds. (Ref: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/15/100 ) It looks like this could be trivially fixed in a mergeable way. That LKML thread petered out before the problem was seriously analyzed. Did you try the -Z flag of hdparm? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
- References:
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
- From: "Simon Arlott" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface
- Prev by Date: Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host.
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Create instrumentation directory (git repository)
- Previous by thread: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
- Next by thread: Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
- Index(es):
 |