On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 09:11:11AM -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > I'm sure that the majority of Linux users would never acquire > the 4-board assembly that we use to acquire X-Ray data and > generate real-time images for the baggage scanners in use > at the world's major airports. That assembly, containing > numerous CPUs and other high-speed pipelined stuff would > cost the user about US$100,000 so I'm pretty sure that > are not many takers so it is very unlikely that any modules > to support it would never get into the mainstream kernel. Of course it would be accepted, hell, we have a whole sub-architecture with what, 3 users? :) So please submit patches for your drivers, and we will be glad to review them. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Module* Framework)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Module* Framework)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] nf_nat_h323.c unneeded rcu_dereference() calls
- Next by Date: [PATCH] More CFI fixups for Atmel chips
- Previous by thread: Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- Next by thread: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
- Index(es):
 |