Re: [2.6 patch] blackfin: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 10/25/07, H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Do you have any example for your claim "to get gcc to not inline things
when building debug versions"?
$ cat test.c
__attribute__((always_inline)) int foo(void) { return 0; }
int main(void){ return foo(); }
$ gcc -g test.c -o test
$ readelf -s test | grep FUNC | grep -v _
    61: 00000000004004b8    11 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 foo
    68: 00000000004004c3    11 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 main

looks pretty straightforward to me
For "debug version" meaning -O0, this is true.

which is what i meant, sorry for not being more clear

anyways, this is all moot ... we dont want "always inline" nor do we
want "static inline" for our string functions.  we want the classical
GNU meaning of "extern inline" which means we're going to either have
a Blackfin specific "extern_inline" define or we get one added to the
common compiler headers and use that.

Peter (or is it "H. Peter" ?): you going to post a patch or should i ?
-mike

Just "Peter" is fine :)

Go right ahead.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux