Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 10/24/07, Jie Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/25/07, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
"extern inline" will have different semantics with gcc 4.3.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
--- a/include/asm-blackfin/string.h
+++ b/include/asm-blackfin/string.h
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
#ifdef __KERNEL__ /* only set these up for kernel code */
#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRCPY
-extern inline char *strcpy(char *dest, const char *src)
+static inline char *strcpy(char *dest, const char *src)
{
char *xdest = dest;
char temp = 0;
What if we compile it with gcc 4.1?
we'll have to either use the gcc attributes to force old inline
behavior or use the gcc flag to force it
We should probably have an extern_inline define then, assuming this is a
function that does exist in a linkable version already -- otherwise
"static inline" is correct.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
