Re: [2.6 patch] blackfin: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/25/07, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:07:45PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 10/25/07, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:16:40PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On 10/25/07, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:06:14PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > > > > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > >> we'll have to either use the gcc attributes to force old inline
> > > > > >> behavior or use the gcc flag to force it
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We should probably have an extern_inline define then, assuming this is a
> > > > > > function that does exist in a linkable version already -- otherwise "static
> > > > > > inline" is correct.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since we #define inline to be __attribute__((always_inline))
> > > > > "extern inline" with the old semantics would only behave differently
> > > > > if someone took the address of one of these string functions.
> > > >
> > > > that isnt what we intended ;)
> > > >
> > > > > Does this happen anywhere in the blackfin port?
> > > >
> > > > gcc is also free to ignore the optimized inline in favor of an
> > > > external reference
> > >
> > > It is not since we #define inline to be __attribute__((always_inline)).
> >
> > as i said, that was not what we intended ... and actually,
> > always_inline does not mean always inline ... it is still possible to
> > get gcc to not inline things when building debug versions.
>
> Do you have any example for your claim "to get gcc to not inline things
> when building debug versions"?

$ cat test.c
__attribute__((always_inline)) int foo(void) { return 0; }
int main(void){ return foo(); }
$ gcc -g test.c -o test
$ readelf -s test | grep FUNC | grep -v _
    61: 00000000004004b8    11 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 foo
    68: 00000000004004c3    11 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   13 main

looks pretty straightforward to me
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux