On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:44:59AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > If you're soliciting opinions, I think I tend to prefer the feel of the
> > code paths after the changes. I don't know the benefits of the change
> > are worth the risk in unmaintained file systems, though.
> >
> > > + return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(inode));
> >
> > This caught my eye. Surely we can do better :). It seems to happen a
> > few times in the patches, the instance in this patch was the first that
> > I noticed.
>
> Yeah. The above obviously *should* be the same as
>
> return inode;
>
> apart from a few casts. But if the casts matter, there's something else
> wrong.
befs_lookup, which the above gem is from, returns a dentry *.
And given either
return (dentry *)inode;
or
return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(inode));
I tend to prefer the latter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
