Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
Why 512 words ?
Though I have queued Mark's patch to be applied, my gut feeling would lean towards a single DRQ block, rather than 512.

Why not just work from the old IDE code.

 	ata_altstatus(ap);
-	ata_chk_status(ap);
+	ata_drain_fifo(ap, qc);
ap->ops->cleanup();

might be wiser
If someone needs that, they can override the error handler with their own. No need for a new op.

PDC202xx needs

Alan, you're the expert there (my condolences!).
Can you generate a fix for the PDC202xx to go with this?

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux