Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation

[Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>]

Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Why 512 words ?
> > Though I have queued Mark's patch to be applied, my gut feeling would 
> > lean towards a single DRQ block, rather than 512.
> Why not just work from the old IDE code.
> > > >  	ata_altstatus(ap);
> > > > -	ata_chk_status(ap);
> > > > +	ata_drain_fifo(ap, qc);
> > > ap->ops->cleanup();
> > >
> > > might be wiser
> > If someone needs that, they can override the error handler with their 
> > own.  No need for a new op.
> PDC202xx needs
Alan, you're the expert there (my condolences!).
Can you generate a fix for the PDC202xx to go with this?

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/