Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation

> > Why 512 words ?
> 
> Though I have queued Mark's patch to be applied, my gut feeling would 
> lean towards a single DRQ block, rather than 512.

Why not just work from the old IDE code.
> 
> 
> >>  	ata_altstatus(ap);
> >> -	ata_chk_status(ap);
> >> +	ata_drain_fifo(ap, qc);
> > 
> > ap->ops->cleanup();
> > 
> > might be wiser
> 
> If someone needs that, they can override the error handler with their 
> own.  No need for a new op.

PDC202xx needs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Bryan Woods <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: "Michal Piotrowski" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pata_atiixp: Audit notes on locking
• Next by Date: Re: correct kernel parameter in documentation.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]