Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it must
remain. You are free to derive work and redistribute under your
license, but the original copyright and license permission remains
intact. Many other entities (Microsoft, Apple, Sun, etc) have used BSD
code and have no problem understanding this. Why is this so difficult
for the Linux brain share to absorb?
Why is it so difficult to understand dual licensing?
Maybe because Reyk's code was never dual-licensed?
And yet a good portion of Theo's response, in particular his accusations
of Alan Cox exhorting people to break the law, were directly related to
dual licensing.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
