On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > > This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code licensing.
> >
> > What myth? The myth that Theo understands dual licensing?
>
> Reyk's code was never dual licensed, so it's not like it even matters
> to the original dispute.
It's no longer dual licenced in the FreeBSD tree because the FreeBSD
people removed the GPL choice of the dual licenced code 3 months ago.
So all of Theo's accusations of people breaking the law by making this
dual licenced code GPL-only apply as well to the FreeBSD people...
> That said, I don't see what exact wording you consider inaccurate.
Both the FreeBSD and Linux people draw the logical conclusion that this
"Alternatively" means everyone can always choose to remove one of the
two choices alternatively offered.
According to Theo, that is "breaking the law"...
> C.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
