On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 02:39:15AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> Tangential, but I've often wondered what are the upsides of keeping
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_ALGAPI as a separate config option in the first place? Every
> single item in crypto/ ends up "select"ing it (directly or transitively)
> so it makes all sense to just do away with it and keep it == CONFIG_CRYPTO
> in the Makefile, thusly:
NACK. ALGAPI exists so that it can be built as a module, as
opposed to CRYPTO which is always built-in. It's already
invisible to the user so I don't see why you have a problem
with it.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
