On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Right now it looks like we have a list of sane candidates up, which I > certainly would be willing to vote for. However, it would be a shame > that the credibility of the election is lost because of sticking to an > undemocratic voting procedure. A procedure which it in fact was stated > when the board was created last year, would be replaced this year. Democracy is an ideal that is not attainable. A representative democracy is usually the best you can get. So you need people that have some competence to contribute to the endeavor. And AFAICT we approximate that reasonably. Many of the people that were not subject to the git commit quota are experienced hands that are valuable because of their experience with Linux and the Summit. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Andy Isaacson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: "Josh Boyer" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] PM: Improve handling of ACPI system state indicator (rev. 3)
- Next by Date: Re: cpufreq affects traffic control rates
- Previous by thread: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- Next by thread: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
- Index(es):