On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:53:41PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Fuck you Martin! > > I think you meant to yell at Matthew, not Martin ;) Yes, of course :) Also thanks to all the people pointing that out in private. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: "Matthew Hawkins" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- Prev by Date: Re: pluggable scheduler thread (was Re: Volanomark slows by 80% under CFS)
- Next by Date: Re: forcedeth ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- Index(es):
 |