> Fuck you Martin! I think you meant to yell at Matthew, not Martin ;) - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- From: "Matthew Hawkins" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- References:
- Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- SD still better than CFS for 3d (was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: "Matthew Hawkins" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Linus 2.6.23-rc1
- Prev by Date: Re: [1/3] 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions v3
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] UML - Console should handle spurious IRQS
- Previous by thread: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- Next by thread: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- Index(es):
 |