Al Viro wrote:
> BTW, I really wonder how much pain could be avoided if updatedb recorded
> mtime of directories and checked it.
Someone mentioned a variant of slocate above that they called mlocate,
and that Red Hat ships, that seems to do this (if I understand you and
what mlocate does correctly.)
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Frank Kingswood <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: serial flow control appears broken
- Next by Date: Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks
- Previous by thread: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Next by thread: Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Index(es):
 |