On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:20:25 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > Once we give the kernel the knowledge that the dentry wont be used again > by this app, the kernel can do a lot more intelligent decision and not > baloon the dentry cache. > > ( we _do_ want to baloon the dentry cache otherwise - for things like > "find" - having a fast VFS is important. But known-use-once things > like the daily updatedb job can clearly be annotated properly. ) Mutter. /proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure has been there for what, three years? Are any distros raising it during the updatedb run yet? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- References:
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Frank Kingswood <frank@kingswood-consulting.co.uk>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [drm:i810_wait_ring] *ERROR* space: 65476 wanted 65528
- Next by Date: Re: updatedb
- Previous by thread: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Next by thread: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Index(es):
![]() |