On 7/25/07, Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess /proc/meminfo, /proc/zoneinfo, /proc/vmstat, /proc/slabinfo > before and after the updatedb run with the latest kernel would be a > first step. top and vmstat output during the run wouldn't hurt either. Hi Nick, I've attached two files with this kind of info. Being up at the cron hours of the morning meant I got a better picture of what my system is doing. Here's a short summary of what I saw in top: beagleindexer used gobs of ram. 600M or so (I have 1G) updatedb didn't use much ram, but while it was running kswapd kept on frequenting the top 10 cpu hogs - it would stick around for 5 seconds or so then disappear for no more than 10 seconds, then come back again. This behaviour persisted during the run. updatedb ran third (beagleindexer was first, then update-dlocatedb) I'm going to do this again, this time under a CFS kernel & use Ingo's sched_debug script to see what the scheduler is doing also. Let me know if there's anything else you wish to see. The running kernel at the time was 2.6.22.1-ck. There's no slabinfo since I'm using slub instead (and I don't have slub debug enabled). Cheers, -- Matt
Attachment:
beaglecron.ck
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
updatedbcron.ck
Description: Binary data
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- References:
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- Next by Date: Re: [ck] Linux Kernel cfs scheduler and xorg kbd
- Previous by thread: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Next by thread: Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Index(es):