Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2

[Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>]

On Thu, Jul 19 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Index: linux/block/blktrace.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/block/blktrace.c
> > +++ linux/block/blktrace.c
> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void trace_note(struct blk_trace 
> >  		const int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >  
> >  		t->magic = BLK_IO_TRACE_MAGIC | BLK_IO_TRACE_VERSION;
> > -		t->time = sched_clock() - per_cpu(blk_trace_cpu_offset, cpu);
> > +		t->time = cpu_clock(cpu) - per_cpu(blk_trace_cpu_offset, cpu);
> >  		t->device = bt->dev;
> >  		t->action = action;
> >  		t->pid = pid;
> > @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ void __blk_add_trace(struct blk_trace *b
> >  
> >  		t->magic = BLK_IO_TRACE_MAGIC | BLK_IO_TRACE_VERSION;
> >  		t->sequence = ++(*sequence);
> > -		t->time = sched_clock() - per_cpu(blk_trace_cpu_offset, cpu);
> > +		t->time = cpu_clock(cpu) - per_cpu(blk_trace_cpu_offset, cpu);
> >   
> 
> What's this measuring here?  Time spend in IO?  Wouldn't it be better
> off with a measurement of real monotonic time?

It's not time spent in IO, it wants a nanosecond timestamp.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/