Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> btw., could you apply the patch below as well? Maybe sched_clock() is 
> misbehaving on your box? (with this i have 5 softlockup patches in my 
> tree - and they are working fine so far.)
>
> 	Ingo
>
> ---------------->
> Subject: [patch] softlockup: use a reliable global time source
> From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
>
> using sched_clock() for the soft-lockups was a bad idea, sched_clock()
> is not a reliable global time-source.
>   

How reliable does it need to be?  All we need is to measure "about 10
seconds"; if we can't get that out of it, how can it be good for
anything else?

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux