Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> that's still an important question, but these changes are still needed 
> nevertheless, to unbreak softlockup.c 

Well, I'm happy with using jiffies as the backport fix for softlockup
(if sched_clock is indeed a problem there), but mainly because it won't
affect Xen.  I don't know what effect it will have on vmi though.

cpu_clock seems like a good approach for .23 onwards.  I guess I should
test it at some point...

    J


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux