* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote: > > how about the patch below instead? (which, unlike the first one, > > happens to build and boot ;-) > > Yes, that should be fine if its just based on sched_clock. Presumably > that means that any architecture (eg, s390) which chooses to implement > sched_clock as unstolen time will get good behaviour from softlockup > as well as the scheduler. yeah, that's the idea. > How does this interact with the sched_clock changes Andi just posted? those changes pose no problem, and they are largely orthogonal. Andi's changes should improve the quality of sched_clock() on some boxes that encounter a cpu frequency transition that makes the TSC readout unreliable. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2
- References:
- Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2
- Index(es):
 |