On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:26 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > By breaking the UNIX model of nice levels. Not an option in my book. > > BTW what is the "UNIX model of nice levels"? > > SUS specifies the limit via NZERO, which is defined as "Minimum Acceptable > Value: 20", I can't find any information that it must be 20. I have never encountered a UNIX where it is anything other than 20. Convention (alas not specification) does dictate 20. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: CONFIG_PAGE_SHIFT (aka software PAGE_SIZE)
- Next by Date: Re: i386: pata_cs5520 does not work
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- Next by thread: Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Index(es):
![]() |