Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Roman Zippel noticed inconsistency of the wmult table. wmult[16] has a missing digit.
[snip] While we're at it, isn't the comment above the wmult table incorrect? The multiplier is 1.25, meaning a 25% change per nice level, not 10%. - Jim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- References:
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: Hibernation Redesign
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/5] avoid tlb gather restarts.
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- Index(es):
 |