Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>]

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Roman Zippel wrote:
>
> To illustrate the problem a little different: a task with a nice level -20 
> got around 700% more cpu time (or 8 times more), now it gets 8500% more 
> cpu time (or 86.7 times more).

Ingo, that _does_ sound excessive. 

How about trying a much less aggressive nice-level (and preferably linear, 
not exponential)?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/