Hi, On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > By breaking the UNIX model of nice levels. Not an option in my book. BTW what is the "UNIX model of nice levels"? SUS specifies the limit via NZERO, which is defined as "Minimum Acceptable Value: 20", I can't find any information that it must be 20. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- References:
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic (IPv6)
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: CONFIG_PAGE_SHIFT (aka software PAGE_SIZE)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- Index(es):
![]() |