Hi, On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > By breaking the UNIX model of nice levels. Not an option in my book. BTW what is the "UNIX model of nice levels"? SUS specifies the limit via NZERO, which is defined as "Minimum Acceptable Value: 20", I can't find any information that it must be 20. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- References:
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic (IPv6)
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: CONFIG_PAGE_SHIFT (aka software PAGE_SIZE)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- Index(es):
 |