Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19

* Ian Kent <[email protected]> wrote:

> > ah! It passes in a low-res time source into a high-res time interface 
> > (pthread_cond_timedwait()). Could you change the time(NULL) + 1 to 
> > time(NULL) + 2, or change it to:
> > 
> > 	gettimeofday(&wait, NULL);
> > 	wait.tv_sec++;
> 
> OK, I'm with you, hi-res timer.
> But even so, how is the time in the past after adding a second.
> 
> Is it because I'm not setting tv_nsec when it's close to a second 
> boundary, and hence your recommendation above?

yeah, it looks a bit suspicious: you create a +1 second timeout out of a 
1 second resolution timesource. I dont yet understand the failure mode 
though that results in that looping and in the 30% CPU time use - do you 
understand it perhaps? (and automount is still functional while this is 
happening, correct?)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hibernation considerations
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]