Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19

On 07/13/2007 05:19 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> 
> I should really go back to 2.6.21.6, 2.6.22 has many bizarre behaviors
> with FC6. Automount starts taking 30% of CPU (unused at the moment)

Can you confirm whether CFS is involved, i.e. does it spin like that
even without the CFS patch applied?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 6/7] Add common orderly_poweroff()
• Next by Date: Re: Linux Kernel Development
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]