On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:31:14AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 10:15 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > Do you think I should add these functions into my patch, even if I
> > cannot test it, or it's enought providing just the
> > compat_sys_time_pps_fetch() function?
>
> Probably best to put them in. That way, you make it easier for people to
Mmm... so I should provide new syscalls for _all_
architectures... gulp! :)
It could be acceptable, just for the first release, to provide the
support for x86 only?
In this manner we can have a first release of LinuxPPS in the main
line just for x86 and then me, or other people, may add support for
the several supported architectures.
> test. Ideally, you should also provide a simple program that other
> people can use to test it, preferably without needing hardware (or at
> least just a nullmodem cable and another test program at the other end
> of it).
I already have a basic testing program... I can add it into
Documentation/pps directory, can't I?
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: [email protected]
Linux Device Driver [email protected]
Embedded Systems [email protected]
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
