On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:08:53AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 00:46 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > Just last question: I still don't well understand where I should
> > declare the new compat_sys_time_pps_fetch() syscall... it's
> > automagically defined by the system when CONFIG_COMPAT is enabled? :-o
>
> It isn't used on i386. On a 64-bit architecture, you need to put
> compat_sys_time_pps_fetch() into the syscall table for 32-bit
> processes.
>
> On PowerPC you do this by using COMPAT_SYS_SPU(time_pps_fetch) instead
> of SYSCALL_SPU(..) in include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h. On x86_64 you'd put
> it into the ia32_sys_call_table in arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
I see.
Do you think I should add these functions into my patch, even if I
cannot test it, or it's enought providing just the
compat_sys_time_pps_fetch() function?
Thanks,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: [email protected]
Linux Device Driver [email protected]
Embedded Systems [email protected]
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
