Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:59:23 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]> wrote:

> [Andrew Morton - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:54:22PM -0700]
> | On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:34:03 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]> wrote:
> | 
> | > | That patch is DOA, methinks.
> | > | 
> | > 
> | > Andrew, what does it mean - "DOA"? Dead on arrival?
> | 
> | yes - I dropped it.
> | 
> 
> But that could lead to rejection of my code-style-conversion patch...
> Should I remake them?

Actually I've rebuilt those patches four times already.  People keep
changing stuff.

> Actually Jan was right, the current state of UDF (without his patches)
> could lead to lost blocks and his patch must be just fixed I think.

sure.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux