On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:34:03 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]> wrote: > | That patch is DOA, methinks. > | > > Andrew, what does it mean - "DOA"? Dead on arrival? yes - I dropped it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] Fix possible UDF data corruption
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2] Fix possible UDF data corruption
- Prev by Date: Re: Dependent CPU core speed reporting not updated with CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- Index(es):
 |