Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Andrew Morton - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:54:22PM -0700]
| On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:34:03 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]> wrote:
| 
| > | That patch is DOA, methinks.
| > | 
| > 
| > Andrew, what does it mean - "DOA"? Dead on arrival?
| 
| yes - I dropped it.
| 

But that could lead to rejection of my code-style-conversion patch...
Should I remake them?

Actually Jan was right, the current state of UDF (without his patches)
could lead to lost blocks and his patch must be just fixed I think.

		Cyrill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux