"Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> writes: > that's not true, AFAICT. the pattern seems to be that, in the case of > declarations, attributes go at the end, as in: Anyway, that attribute has to be in the declarations as without it there the compiler can't optimize the callers. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- Prev by Date: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
- Next by Date: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
- Previous by thread: Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- Next by thread: Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- Index(es):
 |