On Wed, 23 May 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > > that may be but, as i suggested earlier, that would get into
> > > guessing what those developers were thinking, and i just didn't
> > > want to go there.
> >
> > No guessing, I just checked it (though a second check wouldn't do
> > any harm).
> >
> > > the simple version of the patch is now in andrew's tree, and
> > > i'll worry about the harder stuff next time.
> >
> > The "next time" would be much harder as there would be no key for
> > searching for these functions.
>
> Krzysztof's absolutely right ... we don't want to lose the
> NORET_TYPE annotations on all these functions before we switch them
> to ATTRIB_NORET. And yes, _all_ of these NORET_TYPE's do want to be
> ATTRIB_NORET (except for those that are double-annotated, for those
> we can just get rid of the NORET_TYPE macro).
ok, i'll go back and take another look at this.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
