On 5/23/07, Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]> wrote:
"Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> writes:
> that may be but, as i suggested earlier, that would get into guessing
> what those developers were thinking, and i just didn't want to go
> there.
No guessing, I just checked it (though a second check wouldn't do
any harm).
> the simple version of the patch is now in andrew's tree, and i'll
> worry about the harder stuff next time.
The "next time" would be much harder as there would be no key for
searching for these functions.
Krzysztof's absolutely right ... we don't want to lose the NORET_TYPE
annotations on all these functions before we switch them to
ATTRIB_NORET. And yes, _all_ of these NORET_TYPE's do want
to be ATTRIB_NORET (except for those that are double-annotated,
for those we can just get rid of the NORET_TYPE macro).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
