Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 22 May 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:09:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >   given that:
> >
> > $ grep -r "define.*NORET_TYPE" *
> > include/linux/ext4_fs.h:# define NORET_TYPE    /**/
> > include/linux/linkage.h:#define NORET_TYPE    /**/
> > include/linux/ext3_fs.h:# define NORET_TYPE    /**/
> > $
> >
> > is there any obvious value to the 30 or so uses of that macro
> > sprinkled throughout the tree?
>
> I can be mistaken, but it seems the uses should be replaced with your
> __noreturn

no, i think you're thinking of the alternative ATTRIB_NORET macro.
as you can read in my previous post, NORET_TYPE used to resolve to
"__volatile__" for very old gcc.  so i think it's legitimately dead
and can be ripped out.

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux