* Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ingo: to make things easier, the _best_ split-up would be not "this is
> the historical series of patches leading up to CFS v15" or something
> like that, but it would be nice to get that final CFS version as a
> series of patches that do some specific things rather than as one
> final one. Is there any possibility that could happen?
sure enough, i'll work something sane out - i already have it partly
split up. It will probably be something along the lines of: 'remove
stuff that we can remove and still have functional scheduling' followed
by an 'add minimal CFS patch' and then nicely split up 'CFS related
add-ons' (like the task-stats accounting things, debugging, etc). Do you
think i should try to split up the core CFS bits some more beyond this
level? (that would be quite nontrivial i suspect)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
