Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 25 May 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> ok - then please merge that single hunk into the paravirtops patch - and 
> leave the other 6 hunks in this patch.

Note: I'm actually much more interested in applying the scheduler changes 
than the paravirt-ops changes. It looks like CFS is getting stable, I'd 
much rather have Ingo working on making a nice CFS patch on top of 2.6.22 
(and the current -git tree should obviously approximate that, I don't 
expect any real changes to scheduler stuff), and merge that immediately 
after 2.6.22 is out. 

Ingo: to make things easier, the _best_ split-up would be not "this is the 
historical series of patches leading up to CFS v15" or something like 
that, but it would be nice to get that final CFS version as a series of 
patches that do some specific things rather than as one final one. Is 
there any possibility that could happen? 

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux