On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote: > > Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on his > machine. > Now who of the readers owes a Broadcom 4401 NIC and can please try to > test kernel 2.6.22-rc2-mm1? > > Those NICs have been used very very often as onboard controllers, > especially on ASUS boards. I've been using 2.6.22-rc2 for some time and now I compiled 2.6.22-rc2- mm1 and both work fine with the BCM4401 in my laptop. Maxi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
- From: "Uwe Bugla" <[email protected]>
- Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
- From: Uwe Bugla <[email protected]>
- Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
- From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
- Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
- From: Uwe Bugla <[email protected]>
- BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2
- Next by Date: Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
- Previous by thread: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
- Next by thread: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
- Index(es):