Re: RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/20/07, Stefan Richter <[email protected]> wrote:
Satyam Sharma wrote:
> You'll learn about the "default .. if .." Kconfig idiom after you try
> this,

I have seen these in the rest of the patch which I didn't quote.

However you fix it --- don't remove "depends on" or "select".  You can
interchange them, but not remove them, unless there wasn't a dependency
to begin with.

They _can_ be removed, with absolutely no build failures at all, because
of the "default y if ..." on the dependency that is defined in some
arch/.../Kconfig.

In fact the whole _idea_ is to remove any mention of the arch-specific
dependency from arch-agnostic stuff in drivers/.../Kconfig's (be it
"depends" or "select") so as not to generate those "unknown symbols"
warnings that would come on other archs. Hence, the normal practice to
use the "default y if ..." idiom (for "bool" helper code like the original
examples on this thread) in arch/.../Kconfig files.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux