Re: swap-prefetch: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans

[Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>]

Ray Lee wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Ray Lee wrote:
> > > On 5/9/07, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > >> You said it helped with the updatedb problem. That says we should 
> > look at
> > >> why it is going bad first, and for example improve use-once 
> > algorithms.
> > >> After we do that, then swap prefetching might still help, which is 
> > fine.
> > >
> > > Nick, if you're volunteering to do that analysis, then great. If not,
> > > then you're just providing a airy hope with nothing to back up when or
> > > if that work would ever occur.
> >
> > I'd like to try helping. Tell me your problem.
>
>
> Huh? You already stated one version of it above, namely updatedb. But

So a swapping problem with updatedb should be unusual and we'd like to see
if we can fix it without resorting to prefetching.

I know the theory behind swap prefetching, and I'm not saying it doesn't
work, so I'll snip the rest of that.


> > What's wrong with the use-once we have? What improvements are you talking
> > about?
>
>
> You said, effectively: "Use-once could be improved to deal with
> updatedb". I said I've been reading emails from Rik and others talking
> about that for four years now, and we're still talking about it. Were
> it merely updatedb, I'd say us userspace folk should step up and
> rewrite the damn thing to amortize its work. However, I and others
> feel it's only an example -- glaring, obviously -- of a more pervasive
> issue. A small issue, to be sure!, but an issue nevertheless.

It isn't going to get fixed unless people complain about it. If you
cover the use-once problem with swap prefetching, then it will never
get fixed.


> > I don't think it is about energy or being mean, I'm just stating the
> > issues I have with it.
>
>
> Nick, I in no way think you're being mean, and I'm sorry if I've given
> you that impression. However, if you're just stating the issues you
> have with it, then can I assume that you won't lobby against having
> this experiment merged?

Anybody is free to merge anything into their kernel. And if somebody
asks for my issues with the swap prefetching patch, then I'll give
them :)

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/