This is zonelist-order-fix patch version 6. against 2.6.21-mm2.
Works as expected in my ia64/NUMA environment and found no problem
in x86/non-NUMA arch. (This patch has no change for non-NUMA)
There are many types of NUMA systems and this patch affects *all* NUMA
system's memory allocation logic. please test.
ChangeLog V5 -> V6
- some cleanups and compile fixes (no logic change)
- merged documentaion fix from Lee Schermerhon.
- simplified kernel-parameter.txt
- adjusted to 2.6.21-mm2.
ChangeLog V4 -> V5
- separated 'doc' patch and rewrote it.
- more clean ups.
- sysctl/boot option params are simplified.
ChangeLog V2 -> V4
- automatic configuration is added.
- automatic configuration is now default.
- relaxed_zone_order is renamed to be numa_zonelist_order
you can specify value "default" , "zone" , "numa"
- clean-up from Lee Schermerhorn
- patch is speareted to "base" and "autoconfiguration algorithm"
Changelog from V1 -> V2
- sysctl name is changed to be relaxed_zone_order
- NORMAL->NORMAL->....->DMA->DMA->DMA order (new ordering) is now default.
NORMAL->DMA->NORMAL->DMA order (old ordering) is optional.
- addes boot opttion to set relaxed_zone_order. ia64 is supported now.
- Added documentation
As previous post, thanks to Lee Schermerhon for his great help.
[patch set]
[1/3] ---- add zonelist selection logic.
[2/3] ---- add automatic configuration of zonelist order
[3/3] ---- add documentaion.
Any comments are welcome.
[Description]
This patch modifies zonelist order in NUMA. This patch offers two zonelist
order.
(TypeA) zone is ordered by node locality, then zone type
(TypeB) zone is ordered by zone type, then node locality
(TypeA) is called as "Node Order", (TypeB) is called as "Zone Order"
Default zonelist order is determined by the kernel automatically.
Assume 2 Node NUMA, Node(0) has ZONE_DMA/ZONE_NORMAL and Node(1) has ZONE_NORMAL.
In this case, zonelist for GFP_KERNEL in Node(0) will be
In "Node Order", Node(0)NORMAL -> Node(0)DMA -> Node(1)NORMAL
In "Zone Order", Node(0)NORMAL -> Node(1)NORMAL -> Node(0) DMA
"Node Order" will guarantee "better locality" but "Zone Order" places
ZONE_DMA at the tail of zonelist. This will offer robust zonelist agatist OOM on ZONE_DMA, which is tend to be small.
"Which is better ?"
It depends on a system's environment and memory usage, I think.
[Case Study]
On my (and other) ia64 NUMA box, only Node(0) has 2Gbytes of ZONE_DMA.
Assume a machine with following configuration.
Node 0: 12GB of memory 10GB NORMAL 2GB DMA
Node 1: 12GB of memory 12GB NORMAL
Node 2: 12GB of memory 12GB NORMAL
Start a process which uses 12GB of memory on Node(0), then memory usage
will be
Node 0: 0/12 GB of memory is available, NORMAL: empty DMA: empty
Node 1: 12/12 GB of memory is available. NORMAL: 12G
Node 2: 12/12 GB of memory is available. NORMAL: 12G
An interesting matter is "ZONE_DMA is exhausted before ZONE_NORMAL".
This is current kernel's behavior. This can cause OOM very easily if the
system has a device which uses GFP_DMA.
This patch fixes this kind of situation as following. (by using "Zone Order")
Node 0: 2/12 GB of memory is available, NORMAL: empty DMA: 2G
Node 1: 10/12 GB of memory is available. NORMAL: 10G
Node 2: 12/12 GB of memory is available. NORMAL 12G
A user can say "Good bye OOM-Killer" but 2GB of memory is allocated from
off-node memory. it's trade-off.
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
