Eric W. Biederman wrote:
What is the problem you are trying to solve?
2 problems 1) irq's that irqbalance should not touch at all 2) irqs that can only go to a subset of processors. 1) is very real today 2) is partially real on some of the bigger numa stuff already. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- Prev by Date: RE: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Next by Date: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- Index(es):
 |