Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> What is the problem you are trying to solve?
>
> 2 problems
> 1) irq's that irqbalance should not touch at all

This is easy we just need a single bit.  Not 128+ bytes on the huge
machines.

> 2) irqs that can only go to a subset of processors.
>
> 1) is very real today
> 2) is partially real on some of the bigger numa stuff already.

You have said you the NUMA cases is handled in another way already?
In which case irqs that can only got to a subset of processors
shouldn't be a problem.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux