Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs

Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> There is still a question of how to handle the NUMA case but...
>>
>
> the numa case is already handled; the needed info for that is exposed already
> enough... at least for irqbalance

What is the problem you are trying to solve?

If it is just interrupts irqbalanced can't help with we can do that
with a single bit.

My basic problem with understanding what this patch is trying to
solve is that I've seen some theoretical cases raised but I don't see
the real world problem.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
  - From: "Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc1] ib_verbs: Use explicit if-else statements to avoid errors with do-while macros
Next by Date: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
Next by thread: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]