On 12/13/06, Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> wrote:
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes: > the numa case is already handled; the needed info for that is exposed already > enough... at least for irqbalance What is the problem you are trying to solve? If it is just interrupts irqbalanced can't help with we can do that with a single bit. My basic problem with understanding what this patch is trying to solve is that I've seen some theoretical cases raised but I don't see the real world problem.
Good question. irqbalance could use set_affinity from boot cpu to final cpu. YH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- Prev by Date: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc1] ib_verbs: Use explicit if-else statements to avoid errors with do-while macros
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
- Index(es):
 |