Re: [PATCH] fix idiocy in asd_init_lseq_mdp()

On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 18:39 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Far more interesting question: where does the hardware expect to see
> the
> upper 16 bits of that 32bit value?  Which one it is -
> LmSEQ_INTEN_SAVE(lseq)
> ori LmSEQ_INTEN_SAVE(lseq) + 2?

I don't honestly know.  The change was made as part of a slew of changes
by Robert Tarte at Adaptec to make the driver run on Big Endian
platforms.  I've copied Jack Hammer who's now looking after it in the
hope that he can enlighten us.

James

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fix idiocy in asd_init_lseq_mdp()
  - From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix idiocy in asd_init_lseq_mdp()
  - From: Mike Anderson <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] fix idiocy in asd_init_lseq_mdp()
  - From: Douglas Gilbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix idiocy in asd_init_lseq_mdp()
  - From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix idiocy in asd_init_lseq_mdp()
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans (NTP changes)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix idiocy in asd_init_lseq_mdp()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix idiocy in asd_init_lseq_mdp()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]